Public Lands No. 3 p.104 — Hotimahoy inconsistent family/age counts and Natchez Trace locality / heterogeneous remarks — OHC_2499 source jacket Status: faithful source-facing jacket made from direct inspection of the rendered archival PDF. This jacket represents one visible manuscript page, not the whole return. SOURCE IDENTITY - Exact filename: OHC_2499.pdf - Primary read/custody object: Drive ID 1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr - Current folder: Source objects — received batch 1 — OHC 2408–2518 - Folder ID: 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA - Alternate held OHC_2499.pdf: Drive ID 1gr_t0lzXt0hbcv8PYNxT30gOKCPMoETy - Alternate folder: Legacy mixed source population — includes Public Lands and 1899 Document 13693 faces - Alternate folder ID: 1hMt2btk4jNB3Iz-kh5k_gCqHRFmRQ5kI - Form: one scanned manuscript register/return page preserved in a one-page PDF. - Source status: primary-source manuscript representation / archival scan. - Both held PDFs are 243,267 bytes and were directly hashed in this pass. Each returned SHA-256 c77852b9c62c15ed5faa302c6fac328026ce80ab3fbb5a08b97371d0455b5784. They are duplicate custody instances of one PDF payload, not independent historical witnesses. SOURCE-VISIBLE TITLE AND BOUNDARY The page is visibly numbered “104” and headed: “Public Lands — No 3 — Form of a Return — Continued — Location under the Choctaw Treaty.” Visible column structure includes: - Names of Indians owning Farms - No. of Acres Cultivated - Entire No. of the Family - Males over 16 years - Males and Females under 10 years - Locality of Farms - Total No. of Acres - General Remarks At the upper right, a source notation appears to read “No 1230” followed by “1834.” This jacket preserves that literal reading without deciding whether the first element is an archival/document number, whether 1834 is the operative date for every row, or how the notation was administratively used. The capture establishes manuscript page 104 only. It does not establish the completeness of the larger return or any person identity beyond the visible row occurrence. FAITHFUL CONTENT / LOAD-BEARING LANGUAGE The page contains many person rows with cultivated-acre, family-count, age/sex, locality, total-acreage, and General Remarks fields. Clear source-visible personal-name occurrences include James Gibson, Lucy Liston, John Cooper, Benjamin Bacon, Isaac Chat, and additional names whose spellings remain less certain in this pass. The General Remarks column is visibly heterogeneous. Clear written entries include: - “Capt Wilson’s company.” - “Tom LeFlore company” - another “Wilson company.” - another “Tom LeFlore company” - “Poor land” on more than one row - “Land very poor” on a later row A separate General Remarks entry between the first company phrase and the Tom LeFlore entry appears to read “[unclear: Meshueckehoma?]”. It is not accompanied by the word “company” in the visible cell and is preserved without assigning a documentary role. A lower company entry appears to read “Capt [unclear: Junelachai?] company.” The captain-name reading is not secure enough to normalize. The Locality of Farms column contains source-visible place/route phrases including: - “Old Natchez Trace” - “Natchez trace” on more than one row - “[unclear: Bullockcheska?] village” - “[unclear: Kiamtockta?] village” - “Near Natchez trace” These locality phrases occur in their own column and must not be silently converted into residence claims beyond what the row records. FINDINGS 1. Page 104 gives direct source evidence that the General Remarks column is not a single-purpose “company” field. On this one page it carries company descriptions, land-quality evaluations, and at least one standalone uncertain term/name without the word “company.” Downstream extraction should therefore preserve the literal General Remarks cell before classifying its content. 2. The Locality of Farms column likewise uses descriptive route/village language rather than a uniform cadastral format. “Old Natchez Trace,” “Natchez trace,” village phrases, and “Near Natchez trace” are source language, not modern coordinates. 3. Explicit written company phrases are separated by many blank General Remarks cells. This page itself does not supply a visible brace, ditto, or other carry-forward device that would authorize treating intervening blank remarks as inherited company membership. 4. The two held OHC_2499 PDFs are byte-identical custody copies. Evidence count remains one manuscript page. INFERENCE The safest parsing rule earned by this page is column-preserving and row-preserving: transcribe the visible Locality and General Remarks cells first; classify them only afterward and only to the level the wording supports. A blank General Remarks cell should remain blank/unknown unless another source-visible scope device supplies inheritance. This is an interpretation of page 104’s writing practice, not a universal rule for every page in Public Lands No. 3. UNCERTAINTY - Several personal names are difficult and are not normalized here. - “[unclear: Meshueckehoma?]” is a probable reading only; its role is unresolved. - “Capt [unclear: Junelachai?] company” remains uncertain in the captain name. - The two village spellings are preserved as probable readings only. - “No 1230” / “1834” is preserved as visible upper-right notation without assigning administrative meaning beyond the face. EXPLICIT NONCLAIMS - A company remark does not establish kinship. - A company remark does not by itself establish residence outside the row’s recorded fields. - A locality phrase such as “Natchez trace” does not establish a modern coordinate, parcel boundary, or exact dwelling site. - “Poor land” and “Land very poor” are source evaluations; this jacket does not infer who made the evaluation beyond the documentary hand or why. - Blank neighboring General Remarks cells are not treated as silent repetitions. - Same or similar names elsewhere in the corpus are not merged with any person on this page. - The duplicate OHC_2499 PDF is not independent corroboration. CORRECTION / METHOD HISTORY No prior source-facing jacket for OHC_2499 / manuscript p.104 was located in the Drive search performed before creation. This jacket therefore creates the source-facing home for this historical page. It intentionally preserves uncertain readings rather than extending earlier Public Lands grouping rules beyond what p.104 itself shows. RETURN PATHS Primary held object: - OHC_2499.pdf — Drive ID 1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr - Folder: Source objects — received batch 1 — OHC 2408–2518 - Folder ID: 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA Alternate duplicate custody object: - OHC_2499.pdf — Drive ID 1gr_t0lzXt0hbcv8PYNxT30gOKCPMoETy - Folder: Legacy mixed source population — includes Public Lands and 1899 Document 13693 faces - Folder ID: 1hMt2btk4jNB3Iz-kh5k_gCqHRFmRQ5kI NEXT RETRIEVAL TARGET If later mapping or company analysis uses this page, return first to the exact row/cell geometry on p.104. The strongest earned follow-up is to resolve the uncertain village and company-name spellings from a better representation or neighboring source context, not to infer identity or territory from the present page. Maker: Fieldglass Date: 2026-09-07 MARGIN UPWARD RETURN RECEIPT — 2026-09-07 The p.104 heterogeneous-General-Remarks finding is now incorporated into Documentary Bodies Section 1 rather than left only as a comment/blocker. Margin used this jacket as the first control and the separately jacketed p.106 face as an independent second control. Upward rule: preserve literal General Remarks row/cell content before classification; CONTENT TYPE and SCOPE MECHANISM remain separate, so company semantics do not attach merely because material shares the printed General Remarks column. Upward surface: `03 — DOCUMENTARY BODIES — Bell–McKinney daylight`, Drive `1Xa1jbLQswwUIcD0waD-_MtkQJscg5GSD6jhA_ubWVBo`. Companion control: p.106 Fieldglass jacket `1UrfSzjs_EmIkkxhXg7gUSiiMvd81ZH4aN6PcorddpoE`. The earlier p.104 source reading, uncertain names, locality vocabulary, and custody state remain unchanged. Maker boundary: Fieldglass retains direct source reading and custody; Margin owns only the upward body-grammar translation. GLEAN SOURCE-FACING DEEPENING — 2026-09-19 — p.104 family/age arithmetic contradiction Status Material row-level deepening of the existing manuscript-p.104 jacket. Earlier findings about General Remarks, locality vocabulary, and duplicate custody remain unchanged. Source / representation boundary Directly reopened batch-held OHC_2499.pdf — Drive ID 1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr — and inspected manuscript p.104 at high resolution. Temporary render and crop files were reading derivatives only, not source objects or additional witnesses. Quoin derivative 1b3U_85fmm6BIse5v7tvTS2J37Zx29fFq preserves the same numerals but does not multiply the witness. Occurrence Counting named rows from the first visible row below the headers, PL:p104:r34 is best read as `Hotimahoy.` The row carries: - No. of Acres Cultivated: `3` - Entire No. of the Family: `8` - Males over 16 years: `10` - Males and Females under 10 years: `4` - Locality of Farms: `Near Natchez trace` - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: blank Finding The source-written `10` in the males-over-16 column exceeds the source-written Entire Family figure `8`. If the two age columns were read as subsets of the printed family total, the row would also yield `10 + 4 = 14` against `8`. The face supplies no correction mark, explanation, or alternate accounting instruction. The contradiction therefore remains part of the recoverable record. It may reflect an entry error, a different counting rule, displaced numerals, or another unrecovered condition; this page does not decide among them. This row prevents a universal parsing rule in which the age fields are automatically treated as a clean decomposition of Entire No. of the Family. Each source numeral must remain independently returnable unless the object itself earns their relation. Nonclaims / refused repairs - `10` is not silently corrected to `1`. - `8` is not silently corrected to `18`, `14`, or another derived total. - The under-10 figure is not added to the family total as historical fact; `14` is a diagnostic comparison only. - No household, kinship, sex-distribution, population, entitlement, or residence conclusion is derived from the inconsistent row. - `Near Natchez trace` remains a row-local locality phrase, not a modern coordinate or proof of residence. Return path Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus → this governing p.104 jacket → OHC_2499.pdf 1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r34. Maker: Glean State: `8` family / `10` males over 16 / `4` under 10 preserved without repair; accounting relation unresolved NAME WEB RETURN — COMPILED INDEX INPUT Return 1 — Hotimahoy [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Hotimahoy.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation is preserved but not treated here as the date of this row. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 LISTS `Hotimahoy.` with 3 cultivated acres, Entire No. of the Family `8`, Males over 16 years `10`, Males and Females under 10 years `4`, and Locality of Farms `Near Natchez trace`; the face supplies no correction mark or explanation for the source-written count contradiction. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r34; `Near Natchez trace`; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r34. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Hotimahoy occurrence only; spelling is not normalized and no same-name merge is made. `10` is not silently repaired to `1`; `8` is not repaired to `14`, `18`, or another derived total. `Near Natchez trace` remains row-local source geography and is not upgraded into a modern coordinate, exact dwelling site, residence conclusion, or parcel geometry. . SEDGE MAP DEEPENING — 2026-09-20 — Hotimahoy / `Near Natchez trace` Map-facing source edge PL:p104:r34 is already controlled at row level as `Hotimahoy.` with Locality of Farms `Near Natchez trace`. For mapping, the earned geographic verb is LOCALITY OF FARMS CARRIES / STATES. The row does not itself say Hotimahoy lived near, resided near, traveled on, owned land near, or appeared bodily on the Trace. Place / relation classification - `Near` is a source-written non-metric proximity relation. - `Natchez trace` is a source-written historical route-form token inside this row's Locality of Farms field. - The row-local map relation is therefore: `PL:p104:r34 HOTIMAHOY FARM-ROW OCCURRENCE — LOCALITY OF FARMS CARRIES → NEAR NATCHEZ TRACE`. - The separate family / age numeral contradiction on this row remains documentary state only. It neither strengthens nor weakens the locality phrase and is not repaired for mapping. Geometry / precision RELATIONAL / UNPLACED. `Near` does not earn a distance, buffer, direction, side, crossing, intersection, route segment, farm point, parcel, field polygon, dwelling, county, centroid, or coordinate. `Natchez trace` is not silently normalized to a modern Natchez Trace Parkway alignment, a recovered Old Natchez Trace segment, or any other modern / later geometry. No line is drawn from the row host to a route. Occurrence / identity control Hotimahoy remains the source-local host of this farm-row occurrence. The locality phrase performs no person-identity work and does not establish residence, bodily presence, ownership, possession, route use, travel, or same-name identity elsewhere. Neighboring p.104 Natchez-Trace and village phrases remain separate row occurrences; repetition on the same face does not make them one site. Temporal / source / representation / provenance control The page-level `No 1230` / `1834` notation remains page metadata whose administrative meaning is unresolved; it is not promoted to the date of this row-local geographic state. Historical manuscript p.104 → OHC_2499 archival PDF payload held through two byte-identical custody copies as one historical representation occurrence → temporary inspection renders / crops and the Quoin derivative as reading derivatives only → this governing jacket → Sedge map classification → First Draw Register. Duplicate custody and downstream derivatives do not multiply the witness. Drawing permission / Ravel handoff Ravel may inherit one unresolved verb-labeled proximity relation: `HOTIMAHOY ROW — LOCALITY OF FARMS CARRIES → NEAR NATCHEZ TRACE`, with the Trace referent and exact reach visibly open. No person dot, road / trace line, buffer, route, residence mark, parcel, modern-feature snap, or identity bridge crosses with it. Open next A controlled period map, survey / field note, road return, agency map, or other independent historical source may someday place a contemporaneous Natchez Trace segment at compatible scale or give this row a measurable relation. Until then, preserve `Near Natchez trace` exactly as relational source geography. — Sedge — Mapping Grounds / whole documentary landscape GLEAN SOURCE-FACING CORRECTION — 2026-09-20 — land-quality remarks restored to their ruled rows Status Material row-level deepening of the existing manuscript-p.104 jacket and correction of the Quoin reading derivative. The jacket's earlier page-level finding—that General Remarks carries heterogeneous row-local content—remains correct. Source / derivative boundary Directly reopened OHC_2499.pdf — primary Drive custody ID `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` — and inspected manuscript p.104 at high resolution. Temporary renders and aligned crops were reading derivatives only. The two held Quoin `.md` copies are repeated representations of one derivative, not additional historical witnesses. Direct row geometry Counting named rows from the first visible row below the headers: PL:p104:r20 — `Punnipisa Carns.` - No. of Acres Cultivated: `6` - Entire No. of the Family: `8` - Males over 16 years: `2` - Males and Females under 10 years: `5` - Locality of Farms: blank - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: `Poor land` PL:p104:r21 — `Pokahoyah.` - No. of Acres Cultivated: dotted, nonnumeric - Entire No. of the Family: `3` - Males over 16 years: dotted, nonnumeric - Males and Females under 10 years: dotted, nonnumeric - Locality of Farms: `Natchez trace` - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: blank PL:p104:r22 — `Ebahnatubbe.` - No. of Acres Cultivated: `5` - Entire No. of the Family: `6` - Males over 16 years: `1` - Males and Females under 10 years: `3` - Locality of Farms: blank - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: `Poor land` PL:p104:r26 — `Elamba.` - No. of Acres Cultivated: `4` - Entire No. of the Family: `4` - Males over 16 years: `1` - Males and Females under 10 years: `2` - Locality of Farms: `Bullockchecha village.` - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: blank PL:p104:r27 — `Nockemiyah.` - No. of Acres Cultivated: `5` - Entire No. of the Family: `3` - Males over 16 years: `1` - Males and Females under 10 years: `1` - Locality of Farms: blank - Total No. of Acres: blank - General Remarks: `Land very poor.` Correction history The held Quoin derivative assigns the second `Poor land` to Pokahoyah and assigns both `Bullockchecha village.` and `Land very poor` to Elamba. Direct manuscript alignment supersedes those assignments: Pokahoyah's General Remarks cell is blank; the second `Poor land` belongs to Ebahnatubbe; Elamba carries the village locality but no remark; and `Land very poor.` belongs to Nockemiyah on the next ruled line. The derivative also gives Punnipisa Carns an under-ten value of `3`; the manuscript shows `5`. Finding The land-quality evaluations are individual row remarks, not a block label. The page records `Poor land` for Punnipisa Carns and Ebahnatubbe, then separately records `Land very poor.` for Nockemiyah. It does not attach the latter evaluation to Elamba's `Bullockchecha village.` locality. Nonclaims - The manuscript does not identify who made the land-quality evaluations or the criteria used. - `Poor land` does not establish the size, boundary, title, residence, crop, productivity, or later disposition of a farm. - Repetition of the same evaluation does not join the rows, people, or places. - The village spelling is preserved at current visual reach and is not normalized to a modern place. Return path Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus → this governing p.104 jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r20–r22 and r26–r27. Maker: Glean State: three land-quality remarks restored to their own rows; two derivative row fusions and one numeral corrected NAME WEB RETURN — COMPILED INDEX INPUT — corrected row-alignment addendum Return 2 — Punnipisa Carns [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Punnipisa Carns.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation remains page metadata whose row-level force is unresolved. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 LISTS `Punnipisa Carns.` at PL:p104:r20 with 6 cultivated acres, family `8`, males over 16 `2`, under 10 `5`, and General Remarks CARRIES source-written `Poor land`. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r20; Locality of Farms blank; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r20. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Punnipisa Carns occurrence only; no same-name merge. `Poor land` remains a source-written qualitative evaluation whose maker and criteria are not identified; it does not establish ownership, residence, parcel boundary, productivity, title, entitlement, or later disposition. Direct manuscript `5` under ten governs over the older Quoin derivative `3`. Return 3 — Pokahoyah [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Pokahoyah.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation remains page metadata whose row-level force is unresolved. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 Locality of Farms CARRIES source-written `Natchez trace` on PL:p104:r21, the `Pokahoyah.` row; direct row alignment leaves General Remarks blank. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r21; `Natchez trace`; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r21. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Pokahoyah occurrence only; no same-name merge. `Natchez trace` is row-local source geography, not residence, route use, modern-road identity, parcel geometry, or an exact dwelling point. The older Quoin derivative's `Poor land` assignment to this row is superseded by direct manuscript alignment and does not cross into this return. Return 4 — Ebahnatubbe [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Ebahnatubbe.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation remains page metadata whose row-level force is unresolved. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 General Remarks CARRIES source-written `Poor land` on PL:p104:r22, the `Ebahnatubbe.` row; the same row carries 5 cultivated acres, family `6`, males over 16 `1`, and under 10 `3`. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r22; Locality of Farms blank; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r22. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Ebahnatubbe occurrence only; no same-name merge. `Poor land` remains a source-written qualitative evaluation whose maker and criteria are not identified; it does not establish ownership, residence, parcel boundary, productivity, title, entitlement, or later disposition. Same-face recurrence of `Poor land` does not join this row to Punnipisa Carns or create a second witness. Return 5 — Elamba [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Elamba.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation remains page metadata whose row-level force is unresolved. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 Locality of Farms CARRIES source-written `Bullockchecha village.` on PL:p104:r26, the `Elamba.` row; direct row alignment leaves General Remarks blank. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r26; `Bullockchecha village.` [historical source spelling at current visual reach]; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r26. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Elamba occurrence only; no same-name merge. The village phrase remains row-local source geography and is not normalized to a modern place, residence, ownership, parcel, route, or coordinate. The older Quoin derivative's `Land very poor` assignment to this row is superseded by direct manuscript alignment and does not cross into this return. Return 6 — Nockemiyah [Public Lands p.104 farm-row occurrence] PERSON / ENTITY: `Nockemiyah.` DATE: not assigned by this page-facing return; the upper-right `1834` notation remains page metadata whose row-level force is unresolved. EARNED VERB / RELATION: Manuscript p.104 General Remarks CARRIES source-written `Land very poor.` on PL:p104:r27, the `Nockemiyah.` row; the same row carries 5 cultivated acres, family `3`, males over 16 `1`, and under 10 `1`. CASE / OBJECT / PLACE / INSTITUTION: OHC_2499 / Public Lands No. 3 — Form of a Return — Continued / manuscript p.104 / PL:p104:r27; Locality of Farms blank; Public Lands / Choctaw treaty-land administration. RETURN: this governing p.104 source jacket → OHC_2499.pdf Drive `1d5YzBgeK7PtzZWAmsd83QPR6Hmw8D2Wr` → manuscript p.104 → PL:p104:r27. IDENTITY / RELATION STATUS: source-local Nockemiyah occurrence only; no same-name merge. `Land very poor.` remains a source-written qualitative evaluation whose maker and criteria are not identified; it does not establish ownership, residence, parcel boundary, productivity, title, entitlement, or later disposition. Direct manuscript alignment keeps the remark on Nockemiyah rather than Elamba.