One object · more than one reading
Look again.
A Workshop pass recorded eight R-addresses from this chart representation.
Read the object before you accept that population.
This is a derivative reconstruction, not the archival image. Every address shown below is source-visible in the controlled Page_80–Page_82 representations. Geometry here is not evidence of kinship or administrative hierarchy.
The first pass recorded the eight marks outlined in proof color. It did not record the smaller / more internal marks that remain visible in the same object.
⌁
The object already carried sixteen. The second pass did not add eight addresses; it noticed eight source-visible marks that the first pass failed to record.
That changes the Workshop reading, not the represented source population. Carry the correction only when you are ready to supersede the earlier reading.
✓
The earlier omission question no longer stands. All sixteen decision-listed R-addresses are visible in the controlled chart representations.
A different question remains: what, if anything, does the nonuniform graphical hierarchy encode?
The source object did not move. The Workshop claim did.
The eight-visible / eight-omitted reading is now preserved as a superseded Workshop state rather than erased. Separate refusal/control cards remain useful independent carriers, but they are no longer evidence of chart omission.
What does “drawn inside the same bracket” mean?
The source has given us geometry. The verb is still under test.
Now return to the source floor.
The public room does not reproduce the historical chart. It redraws only the address population needed to make the correction encounterable. The controlled chart representations remain senior.
Direct reread carries R 1548, 879, 1546, 874, 873 and smaller/internal R 885, 1547, 891, 893, 889, 887, 883, 881.
Overlapping chart view carries R 875 and R 877 and repeats part of the smaller/internal population.
Further chart segment carries R 872 Mary Caroline Atkinson.
Still unresolved
Chart maker/date; physical-sheet relation; procedural placement; whether graphical depth corresponds to principal applicant, packet structure, household grouping, drafting sequence, source basis, or another administrative convention.
No chart line becomes historical kinship. No R-address becomes person identity. No Robert / Robin, Catherine / Catharine, Article XIV merits, land, patent, entitlement, credibility, or decisional-reliance state moves.