Seale
Commission hearing · 4 Apr 1902
- examined
- Dibbin Marris
- role named
- Oscar Billey · Official Interpreter
Seale, Mississippi · 4 April 1902
Two Commission notes state why two men were represented as unable to appear. One names Pearl River. One does not name the water. Neither note gives us a traveled road.
Commission hearing · 4 Apr 1902
Represented across Pearl River from the Commission camp.
Reported intention to appear. Crossing represented impossible for at least ten days because of high water.
No departure, attempt, ferry, ford, bridge, or crossing point recovered.Represented near Fusky, in Neshoba County, and as knowing of the Commission at Seale.
Appearance represented impossible because of extremely high water.
Water body and obstruction place unnamed. Hasey is represented near Fusky; this cause is not assigned to her.Begin with the proceeding. Open each administrative access state separately.
Side by side
Reported intention to appear; crossing represented impossible for at least ten days.
Knowledge of the proceeding represented; appearance represented impossible.
Neither state supplies a traveled line. Albert does not borrow Wash’s river. Hasey does not borrow Albert’s cause.
Refused transition
An access condition tells us why appearance was represented as blocked. It does not show departure, attempted travel, route geometry, or a shared flood event.
A different kind of reach
The Commission’s 1902 statement recalls an application made at Philadelphia, Mississippi, using Field No. 338, Schedule p. 80, and No. 1197 as distinct retrieval handles.
Administrative recall ≠ Albert’s traveled route. The underlying 1899 application face remains unrecovered.